Don’t shoot the messenger
The Turnbull Government, led by Health Minister Sussan Ley, has recently made a habit of launching attacks on health professionals to justify its health policy decisions, especially the cuts to funding and services and the cost shifting.
It has not just been doctors in the firing line, although the Government has made a habit of demonising GPs, surgeons, radiologists, pathologists, and anaesthetists on a regular basis.
If not through direct attack, it has been via friendly journalists on the drip, or under cover of disenchanted private health insurers desperate to avoid the spotlight as their own sector is under forensic review.
Dentists have been copping it lately, joining the growing queue of health professionals being blamed for the Government’s health policy mistakes and misadventures. Pharmacists and nurses have also come under attack, and they are not amused, and do not take these attacks lightly.
None of the health professions appreciate being criticised publicly in the media, especially when these attacks do not reflect what is discussed in private meetings.
The public – voters – do not like it, either.
Every poll of the professions in living memory has doctors, nurses, and pharmacists rated as the most trusted professions in the community. People trust their doctors and other health professionals. They do not like the ugly spectacle of politicians and some in the media attacking the integrity of health professionals. Needless to say, politicians rate very low on the trusted profession scale.
So, what is behind the misguided strategy of demonising doctors and other health professionals so close to an election? There can’t be any votes in it.
You would think that an incumbent Government would want to win the hearts and minds of health sector leaders in the months ahead of a Federal Election, and on the eve of the Federal Budget, which will shape the direction of the Coalition’s election health policies.
But this is not the case.
Doctors, pharmacists, nurses, Aboriginal health services, and even medical receptionists, have in the past week been blamed for rorts and waste in the system, with incorrect and inaccurate statistics being used to push these mischievous claims.
This is all subterfuge to keep the public focus off the main game – the fact that the Government’s health policies, in the main, are all about making savings to the Budget, not improving access to quality affordable health care for all Australians.
The Government’s ongoing justification for its extreme health savings measures, including cuts to public hospital funding, has been that Australia’s health spending is unsustainable. This is simply not true.
The most recent comparative figures reported by the OECD show Australia’s health expenditure as a proportion of GDP was below the OECD average and lower than 18 other OECD countries.
Australia’s health costs (8.8 per cent), as assessed by the OECD, were just over half the corresponding proportion for the USA (16.4 per cent). Australia achieves better health outcomes for its significantly lower proportional spend than the USA and many other countries, with the second highest life expectancy in the world, with the exception of Indigenous Australians.
Moreover, the Commonwealth Government’s total health expenditure is reducing as a percentage of the total Commonwealth Budget. In the 2014-15 Commonwealth Budget, health was 16.13 per cent of the total, down from 18.09 per cent in 2006-07. It reduced further in the 2015-16 Budget, representing only 15.97 per cent of the total Commonwealth Budget.
Clearly, total health spending is not out of control. Nor is spending on medical services.
The reality is that today we are not spending any more on medical services as a proportion of total health spending than we were a decade ago.
The proportion today is 18.2 per cent, compared with 18.5 per cent a decade ago. While we are spending more on health in total, we are spending less on medical services.
Today, 86 per cent of privately insured medical services are charged at no gap by the doctor – which means that the doctor accepts the fee level set by the patient’s private health insurer.
A further 6.4 per cent are charged under ‘known’ gap arrangements. This means that less than 8 per cent of privately insured patients may be charged fees exceeding private health insurance levels, including known gap amounts.
The number of doctors charging ‘excessive’ fees is in the absolute minority, and the AMA continues to work with the relevant specialist colleges, associations and societies to address this.
Nor are doctors’ fees contributing to Budget woes, with specialist fees in many cases not being indexed for up to a decade.
Contrary to the line being pushed by the Government and the private health insurers, medical services are not an issue for the insurers or for patients.
Some insurers have been only too eager to vilify doctors even though the publicly listed PHIs have posted record profits, their executives are paid multimillion dollar salaries, and when doctors charge above the PHI schedule, i.e. a gap, the PHI contribution falls to 25 per cent of the scheduled fee.
During the December 2015 quarter, insurers paid $3,542 million in hospital treatment benefits. This was broken down into 70 per cent on hospital services such as accommodation and nursing, approximately 15 per cent on medical services, and 14 per cent on prostheses.
General practice, too, has demonstrated a real willingness to work with the Government to deliver high quality reforms, particularly in relation to the treatment of patients with complex and chronic disease.
The 2016 Budget provided the Government with a real opportunity to steer a new course and a new strategy of health policy and health sector engagement, but they passed on this opportunity. We can only hope the Government is saving some health largesse to be announced ahead of the election.
Doctors and the other health professions are restless and demanding better health policy, better consultation, and greater respect in public conversations and pronouncements. We need a mature and honest exchanges of views, not sneaky media leaks and cheap attacks on our integrity and professionalism.
Doctors see millions of Australians face-to-face every day. Multiply that number when you count radiology and pathology centres, pharmacies, and other health professionals.
Some groups have already commenced campaigns against Government health policies. More will join them if there is not a change in policy direction and a change in the Government’s public relationship with the health sector.
* An edited version of this column first appeared in the Australian Financial Review on 4 May 2016.