Sign in with your email address username.


Pharmacist closed shop must end: Govt adviser


A high-powered Federal Government review has declared that closed-shop restrictions on the placement and ownership of pharmacies do not benefit consumers and should be scrapped, intensifying the pressure on the embattled pharmacy sector.

In a blow to the Pharmacy Guild of Australia in its efforts to shield its members from increased competition, the Competition Policy Review ordered by the Government has recommended that rules dictating the location of pharmacies be abolished in the next Community Pharmacy Agreement due to come into effect on 1 July next year.

And the Review, led by economist Professor Ian Harper, has advised that laws prohibiting anyone but pharmacists from owning a pharmacy should also be abandoned.

“The current regulations preventing pharmacies from choosing their own locations, and limiting ownership to pharmacists and friendly societies only, are more restrictive than those in other health sectors (such as general practice) and many comparable countries,” the Review said in its draft report. “[They] impose costs on consumers; yet it is unclear how restricting the location of pharmacies or requiring that only pharmacists can own a pharmacy ensures the quality of advice to consumers.

“The Panel considers that present restrictions on ownership and location are unnecessary to uphold the quality of advice and care provided to patients…[and] it is clear such restrictions limit the ability of consumers to choose where to obtain pharmacy products and services.”

The Pharmacy Guild is fighting a rearguard action to hold on to privileges that shield its members from competition while simultaneously trying to expand pharmacist scope of practise to include health checks and vaccinations.

AMA President Associate Professor Brian Owler has accused the Guild of using the idea of pharmacist health checks as a bargaining ploy as it prepares for negotiations with the Federal Government over the next five-year Community Pharmacy Agreement.

Health Minister Peter Dutton has so far flagged that the Government has no interest in stripping pharmacists of current protections, but the Review’s report, coming on top of Commission of Audit recommendations for earlier this year, will heighten the pressure for a re-think.

The Review said that it accepted the need for some regulation of pharmacies given the pivotal role they play in primary health care.

But it said developments since the turn of the century had made justifications for the existing restrictive regime increasingly tenuous.

It said the rise of discount pharmacy groups, the proliferation of online prescriptions, and accumulated evidence about the effects of deregulation in other areas of the health sector all strengthened the case for change.

“Since 2000, there is a better understanding of how well other primary health care sectors operate without such anti-competitive restrictions,” the draft report said. “For example, ownership of medical practices is not limited to GPs, and nor are GP practices prevented from opening in close proximity to one another.”

The draft report is open for public comment until 17 November.

It can be viewed at:

Adrian Rollins