Log in with your email address username.


Important notice

doctorportal Learning is on the move as we will be launching a new website very shortly. If you would like to sign up to dp Learning now to register for CPD learning or to use our CPD tracker, please email support@doctorportal.com.au so we can assist you. If you are already signed up to doctorportal Learning, your login will work in the new site so you can continue to enrol for learning, complete an online module, or access your CPD tracker report.

To access and/or sign up for other resources such as Jobs Board, Bookshop or InSight+, please go to www.mja.com.au, or click the relevant menu item and you will be redirected.

All other doctorportal services, such as Find A Doctor, are no longer available.

Breast screening in Australia: more harm than good?

'More than 400k' women don't breast screen - Featured Image


Findings from two new NSW studies point to substantial overdiagnosis of early breast cancer and suggest screening may in some cases be causing more harm than benefit.

The studies, authored by researchers from the Universities of Sydney and New South Wales, looked at data from all women in New South Wales who received a breast cancer diagnosis from 1972 to 2012, spanning both the pre-screening and screening years.

One study, which tracked diagnoses of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), saw a 100-fold increase from 0.5 to 16.8 cases per 100,000 women over the period. It found that DCIS incidence has continued to rise despite screening being now well established for over two decades.

The second study, looking at cancer stage at diagnosis, found that the incidence of all stages of breast cancer has increased over the past 40 years, with the greatest rise occurring during the screening era in women aged 50-69 years.

The researchers say that since the purpose of screening is to detect early disease in order to prevent later metastases, it would be logical to see some reduction in advanced disease as screening numbers stabilised.

But that’s not what the figures show. While many more women are being diagnosed and treated for DCIS and early disease, this is not preventing later stage disease and associated metastases.

“Our findings suggest that some of the expected benefits of screening may not have been realised and are consistent with overdiagnosis,” the authors write.

“That distant metastases do not appear to be affected by mammography is a concern given prevention of advanced disease is a key aim of screening, along with breast cancer mortality.”

What may be happening, the authors suggest, is that most of these early breast cancers now being picked up through screening would never have developed into fatal disease had they gone undiagnosed, or would have developed so slowly that older women would have been more likely to die of something else first.

And the result is that while many more women are being diagnosed and treated for DCIS and early disease, this is not preventing later stage disease.

Incidence rates of DCIS continued to rise even after the number of women being screened stabilised, the researchers found. This may be due to a switch from film to the more sensitive digital mammography, as well as other technological advances in diagnosis, including breast ultrasound, MRO and tomosynthesis.

Currently all women diagnosed with DCIS receive treatment, and there is also a trend towards more aggressive treatment such as contralateral mastectomies. The authors warn that the risk of overtreatment is “substantial, with serious effects on quality of life”.

“Our findings suggest that we should rethink strategies for the detection and management of DCIS,” they write. Their findings “lend support to trials evaluating de-escalation of therapy for certain types of early-stage breast cancer, such as DCIS”.

While it’s true that breast cancer mortality rates have dropped considerably over the period studied, the authors say this may be primarily due to improved treatment options rather than screening.

Screening in NSW has been free for women since 1988, and since 1991 women aged 50-69 have been targeted with letters of invitation.

You can access the two studies here and here.