Log in with your email address username.


Important notice

doctorportal Learning is on the move as we will be launching a new website very shortly. If you would like to sign up to dp Learning now to register for CPD learning or to use our CPD tracker, please email support@doctorportal.com.au so we can assist you. If you are already signed up to doctorportal Learning, your login will work in the new site so you can continue to enrol for learning, complete an online module, or access your CPD tracker report.

To access and/or sign up for other resources such as Jobs Board, Bookshop or InSight+, please go to www.mja.com.au, or click the relevant menu item and you will be redirected.

All other doctorportal services, such as Find A Doctor, are no longer available.

[Comment] How Montgomery is reconfiguring consent in the UK

How should consent be measured? The answer to that question will depend on where in the world you practise medicine or receive treatment—whether it be in a patient-centred health-care service like in Australia or a more consumer-driven system such as in the USA. In the UK, the validity of consent was until recently based on whether a reasonable body of medical opinion would agree with it—a principle widely known as the Bolam test.1 However, in a 2015 ruling involving a case of birth complicated by shoulder dystocia that resulted in a child being born with cerebral palsy (Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board 2015),2 the UK Supreme Court declared the Bolam test to be an outdated instance of medical paternalism.