Log in with your email address username.


Important notice

doctorportal Learning is on the move as we will be launching a new website very shortly. If you would like to sign up to dp Learning now to register for CPD learning or to use our CPD tracker, please email support@doctorportal.com.au so we can assist you. If you are already signed up to doctorportal Learning, your login will work in the new site so you can continue to enrol for learning, complete an online module, or access your CPD tracker report.

To access and/or sign up for other resources such as Jobs Board, Bookshop or InSight+, please go to www.mja.com.au, or click the relevant menu item and you will be redirected.

All other doctorportal services, such as Find A Doctor, are no longer available.

[Correspondence] Optical coherence tomography-guided PCI

I read with great interest the results of the ILUMIEN III trial by Ziad Ali and colleagues (Nov 26, p 2618–28),1 which did not show superiority for optical coherence tomography (OCT)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with angiography-guided PCI. No difference was found in the primary endpoint—minimum stent area after PCI—between the two strategies (p=0·12). Although guidance by OCT resulted in fewer untreated dissections than did guidance by angiography (39 vs 61, p=0·006), this difference was driven by an increase in the number of minor dissections in the angiography group compared with the OCT group (35 vs 20, p=0·02); there was no difference in the number of major dissections between the groups (p=0·25).