Log in with your email address username.

×

Important notice

doctorportal Learning is on the move as we will be launching a new website very shortly. If you would like to sign up to dp Learning now to register for CPD learning or to use our CPD tracker, please email support@doctorportal.com.au so we can assist you. If you are already signed up to doctorportal Learning, your login will work in the new site so you can continue to enrol for learning, complete an online module, or access your CPD tracker report.

To access and/or sign up for other resources such as Jobs Board, Bookshop or InSight+, please go to www.mja.com.au, or click the relevant menu item and you will be redirected.

All other doctorportal services, such as Find A Doctor, are no longer available.

Doctors in support of law reform for voluntary euthanasia

- Featured Image

In reply: We thank Dunne and Woodruff for comments on our Perspectives article.1 Both colleagues firmly expressed their opinions. However, we find it telling that neither mentioned consideration of their patients’ opinions and both referred to euthanasia, not voluntary euthanasia (VE), which was the subject of our article.

We agree with Dunne that “it does not seem reasonable for euthanasia to be legalised so that doctors can avoid the scrutiny of the law”. However, we are at a loss to understand his logic in suggesting that legalisation of VE would enable doctors to avoid scrutiny. Scrutiny would be enhanced by defining legal and open processes to be followed, thus satisfying Dunne’s own requirement that doctors should have their actions “subject to scrutiny to protect the public and their own moral and ethical standards”.

We accept Dunne’s personal view that titrated administration of morphine and other drugs is “safe” (notwithstanding a known failure rate with palliative care2). Indeed Dunne acknowledges that the presence of underlying pain may be required to act as an antagonist to respiratory…

email