Log in with your email address username.

×

Important notice

doctorportal Learning is on the move as we will be launching a new website very shortly. If you would like to sign up to dp Learning now to register for CPD learning or to use our CPD tracker, please email support@doctorportal.com.au so we can assist you. If you are already signed up to doctorportal Learning, your login will work in the new site so you can continue to enrol for learning, complete an online module, or access your CPD tracker report.

To access and/or sign up for other resources such as Jobs Board, Bookshop or InSight+, please go to www.mja.com.au, or click the relevant menu item and you will be redirected.

All other doctorportal services, such as Find A Doctor, are no longer available.

Drug checking to improve monitoring of new psychoactive substances in Australia

- Featured Image

Drug checking may need to play a part in future public health interventions

As has been reported previously in the Journal,1 novel psychoactive stimulant drugs are now increasingly prevalent in patients presenting to hospital emergency departments. A further cluster of 11 patients showing confusing hallmarks of sympathomimetic poisoning but no identifiable substance presented to St Vincent’s Hospital in Sydney over a public holiday weekend in April 2015. Also, the start to the 2015–2016 summer festival season has included multiple deaths and hospitalisations following drug use at festivals, leading to calls for novel actions to protect public health.2 Here, we take the opportunity to describe a method of harm minimisation that has been deployed in Europe and could potentially be deployed locally to tackle this problem.

Monitoring new psychoactive substances

New psychoactive substances (NPS) are emerging rapidly into the market, with more than 100 identified in the past year by European monitoring systems.3 Existing psychoactive drug monitoring systems have limited capacity to identify NPS. Their limitations are detailed as follows:

  • self-reports (eg, household surveys and regular interviews with sentinel groups, as reviewed by Burns et al4) can identify…

    email