Log in with your email address username.

×

Attention doctorportal newsletter subscribers,

After December 2018, we will be moving elements from the doctorportal newsletter to MJA InSight newsletter and rebranding it to Insight+. If you’d like to continue to receive a newsletter covering the latest on research and perspectives in the medical industry, please subscribe to the Insight+ newsletter here.

As of January 2019, we will no longer be sending out the doctorportal email newsletter. The final issue of this newsletter will be distributed on 13 December 2018. Articles from this issue will be available to view online until 31 December 2018.

Over 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian study

- Featured Image

In reply: I thank Bece and colleagues and Pitson for engaging constructively with this quality improvement agenda. Bece et al challenge the inclusion of radiotherapy for spinal cord disease in our list of 150 candidate treatments potentially warranting further review under a quality improvement program.1 Pitson calls attention to “loose terminology” in the same example. This latter point, I concede. Precision of language in relation to treatment type and patient indications is essential in this debate.

However, I respectfully disagree with the assertion from Bece et al that listing radiotherapy for spinal cord disease represents an “erroneous conclusion”. In our article we state: “The list includes examples where practice optimisation (ie, assessing relative value of a service against comparators) might be required.”1 Later, I further qualify this point2 and extend the debate.3 The study we cited investigated the relative value of surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone.4 The authors of that study concluded: “Direct decompressive surgery plus postoperative radiotherapy is superior to treatment…

email