Log in with your email address username.


Attention doctorportal newsletter subscribers,

After December 2018, we will be moving elements from the doctorportal newsletter to MJA InSight newsletter and rebranding it to Insight+. If you’d like to continue to receive a newsletter covering the latest on research and perspectives in the medical industry, please subscribe to the Insight+ newsletter here.

As of January 2019, we will no longer be sending out the doctorportal email newsletter. The final issue of this newsletter will be distributed on 13 December 2018. Articles from this issue will be available to view online until 31 December 2018.

Removing the interview for medical school selection is associated with gender bias among enrolled students

- Featured Image

In reply: We thank Behrendorff and Liu for their interest in our paper and their insightful comments. We acknowledge the validity of their argument that gender bias may be associated with a decrease in the number of direct-entry, or domestic, graduate places offered at the University of Queensland (UQ) School of Medicine. However, we would counter that the change in numbers across the two domestic entry pathways is another contributing factor, rather than an alternative hypothesis. In our article we point out that the change in gender ratio was associated with the removal of the interview, not that it was caused by the removal of the interview. As with graduate medical student performance in general,1 there are likely to be a number of interacting factors underlying the change in gender proportions at UQ. For example, the possibility of changing characteristics within the GAMSAT candidate pool is worthy of exploration. Further research is underway to help identify the factors related to the gender differences in GAMSAT performance as well as the underlying causes.