Log in with your email address username.

×

Important notice

doctorportal Learning is on the move as we will be launching a new website very shortly. If you would like to sign up to dp Learning now to register for CPD learning or to use our CPD tracker, please email support@doctorportal.com.au so we can assist you. If you are already signed up to doctorportal Learning, your login will work in the new site so you can continue to enrol for learning, complete an online module, or access your CPD tracker report.

To access and/or sign up for other resources such as Jobs Board, Bookshop or InSight+, please go to www.mja.com.au, or click the relevant menu item and you will be redirected.

All other doctorportal services, such as Find A Doctor, are no longer available.

Risks of complaints and adverse disciplinary findings against international medical graduates in Victoria and Western Australia

To the Editor: In a recent article,1 Elkin and colleagues concluded that, compared with Australian-trained doctors (ATDs), international medical graduates (IMGs) posed a greater risk of attracting complaints to medical boards. However, we think the conclusion is not supported by the data, and might have been compromised by the analytical methods used.

Box 1 of the research article1 shows that IMGs accounted for 37% of the total number of doctors, but were involved in 30% of complaints, suggesting that the risk of complaints among IMGs was lower than among ATDs. Indeed, in a reanalysis of the data, we found that the rate of complaints against IMGs was 25% lower (P < 0.001) than that for ATDs (Box).

The logistic regression used by the authors is suboptimal for count and rate data, which are likely to follow the Poisson distribution. We reanalysed the data using a Poisson regression model assuming similar durations of practice and found that the rate of complaints was highly dependent on the language background of IMGs (Box). For instance, compared with the complaint rate against ATDs, the complaint rate among IMGs…

email