Log in with your email address username.

×

Important notice

doctorportal Learning is on the move as we will be launching a new website very shortly. If you would like to sign up to dp Learning now to register for CPD learning or to use our CPD tracker, please email support@doctorportal.com.au so we can assist you. If you are already signed up to doctorportal Learning, your login will work in the new site so you can continue to enrol for learning, complete an online module, or access your CPD tracker report.

To access and/or sign up for other resources such as Jobs Board, Bookshop or InSight+, please go to www.mja.com.au, or click the relevant menu item and you will be redirected.

All other doctorportal services, such as Find A Doctor, are no longer available.

Vitamin B12 and folate tests: interpret with care

- Featured Image

Clinicians need to consider analytical issues when requesting and interpreting these tests

Vitamin B12 and folate tests are useful for identifying patients with a deficiency. In this issue of the Journal, Willis and colleagues highlight some of the limitations of serum vitamin B12 assays.1 They also emphasise the uncertainty regarding whether red-cell or serum folate should be the preferred first-line test for folate status. The issues underlying some of the data presented require elaboration.

Vitamin B12 assays have an interpretative grey zone in the region of low-normal and mildly low results. Outside the grey zone, the tests show good performance characteristics: a cut-off of 221 pmol/L has a sensitivity of 99%2 and a cut-off of 123 pmol/L has a specificity of 95%.3 Optimal decision points may vary between methods, but results above 220 pmol/L generally rule out deficiency, while results below 125 pmol/L “rule in” deficiency. Between these limits, misclassification may occur if results are interpreted in a binary manner as simply above or below the lower limit of normal (typically about 150 pmol/L). One study used…

email